[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120717234003.GA26937@bbox>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 08:40:03 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] memory-hotplug: bug fix race between isolation and
allocation
Hi Bob,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:13:17PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
> Hi Minchan,
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Like below, memory-hotplug makes race between page-isolation
> > and page-allocation so it can hit BUG_ON in __offline_isolated_pages.
> >
> > CPU A CPU B
> >
> > start_isolate_page_range
> > set_migratetype_isolate
> > spin_lock_irqsave(zone->lock)
> >
> > free_hot_cold_page(Page A)
> > /* without zone->lock */
> > migratetype = get_pageblock_migratetype(Page A);
> > /*
> > * Page could be moved into MIGRATE_MOVABLE
> > * of per_cpu_pages
> > */
> > list_add_tail(&page->lru, &pcp->lists[migratetype]);
> >
> > set_pageblock_isolate
> > move_freepages_block
> > drain_all_pages
> >
> > /* Page A could be in MIGRATE_MOVABLE of free_list. */
> >
> > check_pages_isolated
> > __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock
> > /*
> > * We can't catch freed page which
> > * is free_list[MIGRATE_MOVABLE]
> > */
> > if (PageBuddy(page A))
> > pfn += 1 << page_order(page A);
> >
> > /* So, Page A could be allocated */
> >
> > __offline_isolated_pages
> > /*
> > * BUG_ON hit or offline page
> > * which is used by someone
> > */
> > BUG_ON(!PageBuddy(page A));
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > I found this problem during code review so please confirm it.
> > Kame?
> >
> > mm/page_isolation.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
> > index acf65a7..4699d1f 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_isolation.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
> > @@ -196,8 +196,11 @@ __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> > continue;
> > }
> > page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> > - if (PageBuddy(page))
> > + if (PageBuddy(page)) {
> > pfn += 1 << page_order(page);
> > + if (get_page_migratetype(page) != MIGRATE_ISOLATE)
> > + break;
> > + }
>
> test_page_isolated() already have check
> get_pageblock_migratetype(page) != MIGRATE_ISOLATE.
>
That's why I send a patch.
As I describe in description, pageblock migration type of get_page_migratetype(page)
is inconsistent with free_list[migrationtype].
I mean get_pageblock_migratetype(page) will return MIGRATE_ISOLATE but the page would be
in free_list[MIGRATE_MOVABLE] so it could be allocated for someone if that race happens.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists