[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50069361.1080509@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:43:45 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...aro.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded
tree
On 18/07/12 11:33, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:29:26AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On 18/07/12 10:59, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> It's not the using device tree bit that creates concern for me here,
>>> it's the fact that the board and silicon aren't being separated.
>
>> What's the difference?
>
>>> +- db8500.dtsi // silicon
>>> \
>>> +-- snowball.dts // board
>
> I have glanced at some of this stuff in the past, thanks. Now think how
> that's working for people when they put the configuration for the
> silicon in the same DT node as the configuration for the board...
Granted, ideally the configuration and silicon description should be
separated. I don't know that is the case for us yet however. That is
something I'll enforce when we have a new dts file, which will be coming
very soon.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists