[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1342611635.25411.83.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:40:35 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Cc: aarcange@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
daniel.santos@...ox.com, axboe@...nel.dk, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rbtree: fix jffs2 build issue due to renamed
__rb_parent_color field
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 04:31 -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> Fix this and add a comment explaining why this direct use is safe
> here.
Note that there was already a comment which was *intended* to have that
effect, right before the assignment:
/* Colour doesn't matter now. Only the parent pointer. */
If you're going to make that comment redundant, you might as well remove
it. And you might as well say that the trees are being *destroyed*
(consumed) at this point, rather than just that there will be no further
insert or erase operations.
--
dwmw2
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (6171 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists