linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] uprobe: fix misleading log entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACV3sbKNmeKqvroYp4C=gna7ht4dvYmrCNA7q9Sa0GfVjx7F_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Jul 2012 19:43:29 +0800
From:	Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@...il.com>
To:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobe: fix misleading log entry

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Srikar Dronamraju
<srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> * Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@...il.com> [2012-07-18 11:08:42]:
>
>> From 68232ef2decae95b807f2f3763e8ea99c1a3b2ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@...il.com>
>> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:51:26 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] uprobe: fix misleading log entry
>>
>> There don't have any 'r' prefix in uprobe event naming, remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c |    2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
>> index cf382de..852a584 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
>> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static int create_trace_uprobe(int argc, char **argv)
>>       if (argv[0][0] == '-')
>>               is_delete = true;
>>       else if (argv[0][0] != 'p') {
>> -             pr_info("Probe definition must be started with 'p', 'r' or" " '-'.\n");
>> +             pr_info("Probe definition must be started with 'p' or '-'.\n");
>>               return -EINVAL;
>>       }
>>
>
> Yes, uprobes doesnt support return probes. So we should not have
> mentioned about r.
Hmm, Does this have specific reason? or just not implemented?

>
> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/