[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOPLpQcYiHP7oppUOQx8S5kmy15rKxA-bS=oO-3Ms-KYu3D9Bg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 08:34:10 -0400
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>, acme@...hat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/3] perf tool: Add new event group management
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> Well, I personally like the '{}' syntax more than '--group-events or --group-reads
> option in front', it feels more user friendly.. anyway, we can easily have both ways.
I like the actual visual grouping better, too.
Also, it doesn't require us to define what
-e E1,E2 --group-events -e E3,E4
means. Does --group-events also apply to the first parameter?
> As for the group attributes and group leader sampling, I don't mind omitting
> them at this point and get back to that if we find it useful in future.
Just define the first event the leader. What reason is there which
prevents this?
I can only second what Andi wrote: just get it done quickly. This is
functionality that is desperately needed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists