linux-kernel - RE: Question about tps65090 mfd driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:23:36 +0530
From:	Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>
To:	Joonyoung Shim <dofmind@...il.com>
CC:	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Question about tps65090 mfd driver

Yes, you are right.
it was a mistake.
Will send a patch soon.

Thanks,
Venu


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joonyoung Shim [mailto:dofmind@...il.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 6:14 PM
> To: Venu Byravarasu
> Cc: sameo@...ux.intel.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Question about tps65090 mfd driver
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have one question about tps65090 mfd driver.
> There are following codes in the drivers/mfd/tps65090.c
> 
> ...
> static struct mfd_cell tps65090s[] = {
> 	{
> 		.name = "tps65910-pmic",
> 	},
> 	{
> 		.name = "tps65910-regulator",
> 	},
> };
> ...
> 
> I know tps65090 and tps65910 have each different regulator driver.
> 
> drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c
> drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c
> 
> So, i wonder whether it is right that tps65090 mfd driver has tps65910-xxx.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> - Joonyoung Shim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/