[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120718145032.GB4495@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:50:32 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: "Kim, Milo" <Milo.Kim@...com>
Cc: "sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Girdwood, Liam" <lrg@...com>,
Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mfd: add lp8788 mfd driver
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:32:40PM +0000, Kim, Milo wrote:
> +struct lp8788_irq_data {
> + struct lp8788 *lp;
> + struct irq_domain *irqdm;
> + struct mutex irq_lock;
> + struct delayed_work work;
> + struct workqueue_struct *thread;
> + int enabled[LP8788_INT_MAX];
> + int irq;
> + int irq_base;
> +};
Can you use regmap-irq? If not can we fix things so that's possible?
> +static irqreturn_t lp8788_irq_handler(int irq, void *ptr)
> +{
> + struct lp8788_irq_data *irqd = ptr;
> + unsigned long delay = msecs_to_jiffies(DEBOUNCE_MSEC);
> +
> + queue_delayed_work(irqd->thread, &irqd->work, delay);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
Why a delayed work? That's *very* unusual.
> + if (!lp->pdata) {
> + dev_warn(lp->dev, "no platform data for irq\n");
> + goto no_err;
> + }
Given that you're using irq domains why does the device need platform
data?
> + if (irq_base) {
> + irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(irq_base, 0, LP8788_INT_MAX, 0);
> + if (irq_base < 0) {
> + dev_warn(lp->dev, "no allocated irq: %d\n", irq_base);
> + goto no_err;
> + }
> + }
This shouldn't be needed with irq domains.
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(lp8788_read_byte);
You're reexporting regmap functionality with looser licensing
requirements...
> +unsigned int lp8788_get_adc(struct lp8788 *lp, enum lp8788_adc_id id,
> + enum lp8788_adc_resolution res)
For new drivers the ADC should probably be integrated into IIO.
> +static int lp8788_add_devices(struct lp8788 *lp)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + int irq_base = lp->pdata ? lp->pdata->irq_base : 0;
> +
> + ret = mfd_add_devices(lp->dev, -1, lp8788_devs, ARRAY_SIZE(lp8788_devs),
> + NULL, irq_base);
Since you're using an irq domains you shouldn't need an irq base
specifying in order to use interrupts.
> + if (!i2c_check_functionality(cl->adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK))
> + return -EIO;
I'd expect that's going to give some false negatives...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists