linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] ubi: Limit amount of reserved eraseblocks for bad PEB handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1342668949.16745.0.camel@brekeke>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jul 2012 06:35:49 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ubi: Limit amount of reserved eraseblocks for bad
 PEB handling

On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 22:55 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> However, if you DO NOT mark it bad, but instead go into RO mode, you
> should be able to later re-attach because the good_peb_count would fit
> (no shortage of PEBs). 

Yeah, you are right, I'll return to the original patch.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)