linux-kernel - Re: [Bug 3.4.5] reiserfs: mutex_destroy called with locked mutex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120719042824.GW31729@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jul 2012 05:28:24 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@...nline.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 3.4.5] reiserfs: mutex_destroy called with locked mutex

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 03:37:52PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> >  The only questions
> > are "is this the WARN_ON() Knut had stepped on" (and I agree with your
> > scenario now) and "is it critical enough to shove it into the tree
> > less than a week before -final".  Up to you...
> 
> 
> I agree that it isn't critical. Even the lockdep thing is just a
> warning, and is apparently quite hard to trigger.
> 
> Will you hold on to the patch in your VFS tree, and we can just merge
> it for 3.6?

Sure, no problem...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/