[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120719092608.GA24872@liondog.tnic>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:26:08 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Steve Hodgson <steve@...estorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add blockconsole version 1.1
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 05:08:15PM -0400, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Wed, 18 July 2012 23:45:21 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >
> > > > So why is that first megabyte full of zeros there?
> > >
> > > It gives you some scratch space to store information in.
> >
> > How? By me writing something in that empty line in vim? Or something
> > else storing stuff there?
>
> Assuming you want to do it in an automated fashion - by patching or
> replacing mkblockconsole. Again, I have no opinion on whether this
> actually makes sense. It is possible, it does not really hurt the
> primary function and people have explicitly asked me for it. Good
> enough for me.
I see. It would be interesting to know what the use cases of those
people are. In any case, this is not an interface since you only have
one-way data movement from kernel to userspace and you can change the
formatting/layout of that data later with no obvious issues, AFAICT.
[ … ]
> Or show off your geekiness by using back ticks:
> $ vi `./bcon_tail`
Uuh, magic. Definitely! :-)
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists