[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5007DE28.2080305@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:15:04 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] KVM: introduce readonly_fault_pfn
On 07/17/2012 05:44 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Introduce readonly_fault_pfn, in the later patch, it indicates failure
> when we try to get a writable pfn from the readonly memslot
>
> +
> inline int kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn_t pfn)
> {
> if (pfn_valid(pfn)) {
> @@ -949,13 +952,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_disable_largepages);
>
> int is_error_page(struct page *page)
> {
> - return page == bad_page || page == hwpoison_page || page == fault_page;
> + return page == bad_page || page == hwpoison_page || page == fault_page
> + || page == readonly_fault_page;
All those checks are slow, and get_page(fault_page) etc. isn't very
scalable.
We should move to ERR_PTR() etc. We could use ENOENT, EHWPOISON,
EFAULT, and EROFS for the above, or maybe there are better matches.
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_error_page);
>
> int is_error_pfn(pfn_t pfn)
> {
> - return pfn == bad_pfn || pfn == hwpoison_pfn || pfn == fault_pfn;
> + return pfn == bad_pfn || pfn == hwpoison_pfn || pfn == fault_pfn
> + || pfn == readonly_fault_pfn;
> }
And a similar change here.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists