[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5007F1F3.9090706@osadl.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 13:39:31 +0200
From: Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>
To: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 v3] Honor state disabling in the cpuidle ladder governor
- with sanitizer
Deepthi,
>>> [..]
>>>> I could implement a sanitize mechanism of the ladder governor that
>>>> takes care the "disable" variables of all deeper states are set to 1,
>>>> if a state is disabled, and those of all lighter states are set to 0,
>>>> if a state is enabled. Do you wish me to do that?
>>> No, I dont think thats necessary, current code suffices it.
>>> The disable flag is knob we are giving to the user . So may be just
>>> document the intended use of disable flag working
>>> alongside design of ladder governor.
>> It's not necessary - but maybe better. Here comes v3 with a sanitizer.
>> Is this too ugly?
> The v2, with the documentation in place seems sufficient.
> Yup, this adds unnecessary fields which are not much use
> coz the same can be achieved with just disable flag check.
ok, let's take v2.
> Also, any reason why the patch is being sent as an attachment ?
> Sending patches as an attachment is not a recommended practice.
Sorry.
-Carsten.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists