[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120719125643.30033.58913.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:27:33 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: msb@...omium.org, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shaohua.li@...el.com, yinghai@...nel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, cl@...two.org,
olofj@...omium.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86, mm: Send tlb flush IPIs to online cpus only
Mandeep reports:
We are seeing a softlockup reporting during shutdown. The stack
trace shows us that we are inside default_send_IPI_mask_logical:
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [lmt-udev:23605]
Pid: 23605, comm: lmt-udev Tainted: G WC 3.2.7 #1
EIP: 0060:[<8101eec6>] EFLAGS: 00000202 CPU: 0
EIP is at flush_tlb_others_ipi+0x8a/0xba
Call Trace:
[<8101f0bb>] flush_tlb_mm+0x5e/0x62
[<8101e36c>] pud_populate+0x2c/0x31
[<8101e409>] pgd_alloc+0x98/0xc7
[<8102c881>] mm_init.isra.38+0xcc/0xf3
[<8102cbc2>] dup_mm+0x68/0x34e
[<8139bbae>] ? _cond_resched+0xd/0x21
[<810a5b7c>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x26/0xe2
[<8102d421>] ? copy_process+0x556/0xda6
[<8102d641>] copy_process+0x776/0xda6
[<8102dd5e>] do_fork+0xcb/0x1d4
[<810a8c96>] ? do_sync_write+0xd3/0xd3
[<810a94ab>] ? vfs_read+0x95/0xa2
[<81008850>] sys_clone+0x20/0x25
[<8139d8c5>] ptregs_clone+0x15/0x30
[<8139d7f7>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x26
Before the softlock, we see the following kernel warning:
WARNING: at ../../arch/x86/kernel/apic/ipi.c:113 default_send_IPI_mask_logical+0x58/0x73()
Pid: 23605, comm: lmt-udev Tainted: G C 3.2.7 #1
Call Trace:
[<8102e666>] warn_slowpath_common+0x68/0x7d
[<81016c36>] ? default_send_IPI_mask_logical+0x58/0x73
[<8102e68f>] warn_slowpath_null+0x14/0x18
[<81016c36>] default_send_IPI_mask_logical+0x58/0x73
[<8101eec2>] flush_tlb_others_ipi+0x86/0xba
[<8101f0bb>] flush_tlb_mm+0x5e/0x62
[<8101e36c>] pud_populate+0x2c/0x31
[<8101e409>] pgd_alloc+0x98/0xc7
[<8102c881>] mm_init.isra.38+0xcc/0xf3
[<8102cbc2>] dup_mm+0x68/0x34e
[<8139bbae>] ? _cond_resched+0xd/0x21
[<810a5b7c>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x26/0xe2
[<8102d421>] ? copy_process+0x556/0xda6
[<8102d641>] copy_process+0x776/0xda6
[<8102dd5e>] do_fork+0xcb/0x1d4
[<810a8c96>] ? do_sync_write+0xd3/0xd3
[<810a94ab>] ? vfs_read+0x95/0xa2
[<81008850>] sys_clone+0x20/0x25
[<8139d8c5>] ptregs_clone+0x15/0x30
[<8139d7f7>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x26
So we are sending an IPI to a cpu which is now offline. Once a cpu is offline,
it will no longer respond to IPIs. This explains the softlockup.
A cpu in the mm_cpumask could go offline before we send the invalidate
IPI causing us to wait forever. Avoid this by sending the IPI to only the
online cpus.
[Since flush_tlb_others_ipi() is always called with preempt disabled, it is
not possible for a CPU to go offline once we enter this function, because
CPU offline goes through the stop_machine() stuff (which cannot proceed until
all preempt disabled sections are exited). So we don't have to worry about
any race between CPU offline and the target cpumask calculation in
flush_tlb_others_ipi().]
Addresses http://crosbug.com/31737
Reported-and-debugged-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olofj@...omium.org>
---
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 5e57e11..9d387a9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -186,7 +186,11 @@ static void flush_tlb_others_ipi(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
f->flush_mm = mm;
f->flush_va = va;
- if (cpumask_andnot(to_cpumask(f->flush_cpumask), cpumask, cpumask_of(smp_processor_id()))) {
+
+ cpumask_and(to_cpumask(f->flush_cpumask), cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), to_cpumask(f->flush_cpumask));
+
+ if (!cpumask_empty(to_cpumask(f->flush_cpumask))) {
/*
* We have to send the IPI only to
* CPUs affected.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists