[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120719140609.GA15158@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:06:10 -0400
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, lwoodman@...hat.com,
jbaron@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty, add kref to sysrq handlers
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:22:02AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> [This seems to have been missed ... sending again]
>
> On a large system with a large number of tasks, the output of
>
> echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger
>
> can take a long period of time. If this period is greater than the period
> of the current clocksource, the clocksource watchdog will mark the
> clocksource as unstable and fail the clocksource over.
A lot of our customers are running into this issue (especially the big
boxes). This is patch solves their problem nicely.
The approach is a little heavier than the current approach, but it allows
a useful feature like sysrq-t to work reliably.
Acked-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists