[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50089DC2.5040508@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 07:52:34 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
CC: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, arnd@...db.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com, jeremy@...p.org,
luto@....edu, yinghai@...nel.org, riel@...hat.com, avi@...hat.com,
len.brown@...el.com, tj@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
cl@...two.org, borislav.petkov@....com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
jbeulich@...e.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, akinobu.mita@...il.com,
vapier@...too.org, cpw@....com, steiner@....com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 7/9] x86/tlb: enable tlb flush range support for x86
>> +static inline void flush_tlb_mm_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, unsigned long vmflag)
>> +{
>> + if (vma->vm_mm == current->active_mm)
>> + __flush_tlb();
>> +}
>
> There's a problem with this in one of my randconfig tests. It has
> !CONFIG_SMP and the warning is:
>
> mm/memory.c: In function ‘tlb_flush_mmu’:
> mm/memory.c:230:2: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘flush_tlb_mm_range’ from incompatible pointer type
> /usr/src/linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h:108:20: note: expected ‘struct vm_area_struct *’ but argument is of type ‘struct mm_struct *’
> mm/memory.c:230:2: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘flush_tlb_mm_range’ from incompatible pointer type
> /usr/src/linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h:108:20: note: expected ‘struct vm_area_struct *’ but argument is of type ‘struct mm_struct *’
>
>
> Due to the fact that the macro flush_tlb actually resolves to
> flush_tlb_mm_range and this function has a different signature based on
> CONFIG_SMP. On !SMP expects struct vm_area_struct * as a first argument
> but on SMP its first argument is struct mm_struct *.
>
> So two different function signatures based on a config option? Now
> that's a first. What is going on?
Sure, it is a bug, the fix had sent:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/6/350
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists