[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1342769360.2984.2.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:29:20 +0100
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi tree with Linus' tree
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 10:32 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the scsi tree got a conflict in
> drivers/scsi/scsi_wait_scan.c between commit eea03c20ae38 ("Make
> wait_for_device_probe() also do scsi_complete_async_scans()") from Linus'
> tree and commit 01444e1106cb ("[SCSI] Remove scsi_wait_scan module") from
> the scsi tree.
>
> I just removed the file.
That won't quite work; there's a lot of nasty fallout ... I'll actually
have to rebase the misc and async branches to fix this.
By the way, Linus, the patch says:
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...il.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
But best I can tell it never went to either me or linux-scsi.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists