[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPXgP13W_aqky++LkHeHBUzKFTYNiTJQpchpHLCVDAdYihu5ig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:23:10 +0200
From: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartmann <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Export struct log size and member offsets through vmcoreinfo
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:57:36AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:38:57AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> > If we would swap the 5 + 3 bit field byte declaration, and add
>> > __packed, we can still not rely on the level to be consistently the
>> > lower 3 bits of the byte, right?
>
> I think I missed your point in last response. Are you saying that retain
> bit fields for flags and level, and add __packed() and that will make sure
> level bits are always lowest 3bits?
It was more a question, I don't know how reliable that would be.
> I am really not sure how that is going
> to work. Also if you want to add more fields to struct log down the line,
> it will be a problem to determine the offset of byte where level bits are
> stored.
I guess, we could make sure that it's always the lowest 3 bits of a
byte. But the question if that is safe to do at all still remains. :)
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists