[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201207201155.24730.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:55:24 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arve@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / Sleep: Print name of wakeup source that aborts suspend
On Friday, July 20, 2012, Todd Poynor wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:47:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 18, 2012, Todd Poynor wrote:
> ...
> > > +{
> > > + struct wakeup_source *ws;
> > > + int active = 0;
> > > + struct wakeup_source *last_activity_ws = NULL;
> > > +
> > > + rcu_read_lock();
> > > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(ws, &wakeup_sources, entry) {
> > > + if (ws->active) {
> > > + pr_info("active wakeup source: %s\n", ws->name);
> > > + active = 1;
> >
> > Can we do a break here? Or do we want to get all of them?
>
> I haven't seen more than 3 activated during suspend entry at a time, but
> could just list one. I haven't made that change yet but will if it's
> preferred.
That depend on what your needs are. For debugging purposes it probably is
better to print them all.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists