linux-kernel - Re: [07/36] AArch64: Assembly macros and definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5009698C.2020707@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:22:04 -0400
From:	Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>
To:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [07/36] AArch64: Assembly macros and definitions

Hi Catalin,

On 01/-10/-28163 02:59 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> This patch introduces several assembly macros and definitions used in
> the .S files across arch/aarch64/ like IRQ disabling/enabling, together
> with asm-offsets.c.

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/aarch64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/aarch64/include/asm/assembler.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c6ac3cf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/aarch64/include/asm/assembler.h

[...]

> +#define USER(x...)				\
> +9999:	x;					\
> +	.section __ex_table,"a";		\
> +	.align	3;				\
> +	.quad	9999b,9001f;			\
> +	.previous

It appears that this macro depends on a 9001 label being defined in the
source file somewhere after the macro is used. It might be preferable to
incorporate the label into the macro if possible, or pass the label as
an argument to the macro.

> +
> +/*
> + * User access macros.
> + */
> +	.macro	usracc, instr, reg, reg2, ptr, inc, rept, abort
> +	.rept	\rept
> +9999:
> +	.if	\inc == 1
> +	\instr\()b \reg, [\ptr], #\inc
> +	.elseif	\inc == 4
> +	\instr\() \reg, [\ptr], #\inc
> +	.elseif	\inc == 8
> +	\instr\() \reg, [\ptr], #\inc
> +	.elseif \inc == 16
> +	\instr\() \reg, \reg2, [\ptr], #\inc
> +	.else
> +	.error	"Unsupported inc macro argument"
> +	.endif
> +
> +	.section __ex_table,"a"
> +	.align	3
> +	.quad	9999b, \abort
> +	.previous

Could you use the USER preprocessor macro here to reduce this small
duplication of directives?

> +	.endr
> +	.endm
> +
> +	.macro	ldrusr, reg, ptr, inc, rept=1, abort=9001f
> +	 usracc	ldr, \reg, \reg, \ptr, \inc, \rept, \abort
> +	.endm
> +
> +	.macro	ldrpusr, reg, reg2, ptr, rept=1, abort=9001f
> +	 usracc	ldp, \reg, \reg2, \ptr, 16, \rept, \abort
> +	.endm

How about "ldpusr" to more directly match the assembly?

(Also, the 9001 label strikes again.)

> +
> +/*
> + * Register aliases.
> + */
> +lr	.req	x30		// link register

Regards,
Christopher

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/