linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpumask: cpumask_scnprintf() comments correction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5008BA43.3050301@intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:54:11 +0800
From:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpumask: cpumask_scnprintf() comments correction

On 07/16/2012 04:29 PM, Alex Shi wrote:

> On 07/16/2012 03:40 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:35:54 +0800, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com> wrote:
>>> The function has no parameter @len now, so need to remove it from
>>> comments to avoid kernel-doc warning:
>>
>> But it still does in my tree.
>>
>> Please push this patch via whoever changed it?
>>
>> Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
>>
> 
> Sorry, my fault, the commit log used a wrong function name, it is cpulist_parse()
> not cpumask_scnprntf. and find a new error in the comments: used a incorrect 
> function name: cpulist_parse_user(), the correct one is cpulist_parse().
> Fix it in updated patch.
> 
> Both errors appear in Rusty's commit 29c0177e6a4.


Rusty. The error still exist on upstream tree. Would you like to pick
this fix?

> 
> ===
> 
> From db20433a0b321f7b4edfc57f66e816d7bec81b14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:25:06 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] cpumask: cpulist_parse() comments correction
> 
> The function has no parameter @len, so need to remove it from
> comments to avoid kernel-doc warning:
> 
> alexs@...ian:~/linux-next$ scripts/kernel-doc -man
> include/linux/cpumask.h | split-man.pl /tmp/man
> ....
> Warning(include/linux/cpumask.h:602): Excess function parameter 'len'
> description in 'cpulist_parse'
> 
> and correct the function name in comments to cpulist_parse.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/cpumask.h |    3 +--
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> index 8bf1c27..0325602 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> @@ -591,9 +591,8 @@ static inline int cpulist_scnprintf(char *buf, int len,
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * cpulist_parse_user - extract a cpumask from a user string of ranges
> + * cpulist_parse - extract a cpumask from a user string of ranges
>   * @buf: the buffer to extract from
> - * @len: the length of the buffer
>   * @dstp: the cpumask to set.
>   *
>   * Returns -errno, or 0 for success.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/