[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5008BFC0.4070703@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:17:36 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] KVM: x86: simplify read_emulated
On 07/20/2012 07:58 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> - }
>> + rc = ctxt->ops->read_emulated(ctxt, addr, mc->data + mc->end, size,
>> + &ctxt->exception);
>> + if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
>> + return rc;
>> +
>> + mc->end += size;
>> +
>> +read_cached:
>> + memcpy(dest, mc->data + mc->pos, size);
>
> What prevents read_emulated(size > 8) call, with
> mc->pos == (mc->end - 8) now?
Marcelo,
The splitting has been done in emulator_read_write_onepage:
while (bytes) {
unsigned now = min(bytes, 8U);
frag = &vcpu->mmio_fragments[vcpu->mmio_nr_fragments++];
frag->gpa = gpa;
frag->data = val;
frag->len = now;
frag->write_readonly_mem = (ret == -EPERM);
gpa += now;
val += now;
bytes -= now;
}
So i think it is safe to remove the splitting in read_emulated.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists