[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120720194114.GA21218@google.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:41:14 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: reimplement CPU hotplug to keep idle
workers
Hello, Rafael.
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 09:44:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, there are use cases I'm not really familiar with.
>
> Pretty much the only use case I'm sufficiently familiar with is
> suspend/hibernate where we unplug all of the nonboot CPUs at one point.
>
> The other use cases, which I don't really think are entirely valid,
> are on some ARM platforms where CPUs are unplugged instead of being put into
> C-states or equivalent (because we don't have a good mechanism for handling
> multiprocessor C-states; there's a set of patches for that waiting for
> the merge window in the Len's tree). I'm hoping to get rid of those
> use cases in future entirely.
I see, so the highest frequency user would most likely be
suspend/resume - especially with opportunistic approach like the one
used in androids.
Thanks for the explanation.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists