[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120720.132934.854459589738348753.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: nzimmer@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Robin.Holt@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: further seperate dst_entry.__refcnt from cache
contention
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 22:16:51 +0200
> Another idea concerning very hot dst would be to clone them on demand.
The FIB info cached dsts could also be made per-cpu.
And yes, the only reason I'm entertaining that idea now is the fact
that we'll have the number of dsts in the system under control.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists