[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120721210106.GA6111@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 23:01:06 +0200
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [RFC] firmware load: defer request_firmware during early boot and resume
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com> :
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com> wrote:
> >> The RFC patch is just for discussing if the idea of deferring
> >> request_firmware is doable for addressing the issue of
> >> request_firmware in resume path, which is caused by driver
> >> unbind/rebind during resume.
> >
> > NAK.
>
> Suppose it is not good for resume case, I think it still makes sense
> for early boot
> situation, at least the patch will support to request firmware inside
> init call, and
> allow drivers to be built in kernel in case of requesting firmware from probe().
Could there be a simple, static and inefficient way to link firmware
and code together ?
--
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists