[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120721233714.GL2435@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:37:14 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: fix pwr_btn_event_pending build error
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 12:52:43AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 02:41:56PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > A recent build for KVM on x86 resulted in the following build error:
> >
> > drivers/acpi/sleep.c:60:13: warning: ‘pwr_btn_event_pending’ defined but not
> > +used [-Wunused-variable]
> >
> > This patch silences this error.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > index 8856102..18347aa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > @@ -57,7 +57,9 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(gts, "Enable evaluation of _GTS on suspend.");
> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(bfs, "Enable evaluation of _BFS on resume".);
> >
> > static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
> > static bool pwr_btn_event_pending;
> > +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP */
>
> __maybe_unused ?
Are the compiler and linker smart enough to get rid of the storage in
case it really isn't used? (Not that the storage for a bool is worth
worrying about, but...)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists