[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120721040816.GA7313@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 21:08:16 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...onical.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>
Subject: Re: sysfs permissions on dynamic attributes (led delay_on and
delay_off)
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 05:46:14PM -0700, Colin Cross wrote:
> I'm trying to use the standard ledtrig-timer.c code to handle led
> blinking for notifications on an Android device, and I'm hitting some
> issues with setting permissions on the dynamically created delay_on
> and delay_off attributes. For most sysfs files, we have userspace
> uevent parser that watches for device add notifications and
> chowns/chmods attributes. This doesn't work for delay_on and
> delay_off, because they are created later, when "timer" is written to
> the trigger attribute. There is no uevent when the new files are
> created, and sysfs doesn't support inotify, so I don't see any way to
> receive an event to set the permissions. This issue exists any time
> that device_create_file is called after device_add.
>
> What is the appropriate way to get an event to set the permissions?
> Add inotify support for sysfs file creation? Send a KOBJ_CHANGE
> uevent in device_create_file?
No.
> Send a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent from the driver after calling
> device_create_file?
Yes.
> Dynamically create a timer device under /sys/class/leds/<led> so a new
> add uevent gets sent?
Ick.
> Promote blinking to be a core led feature instead of a trigger, so the
> files are always present?
That's the best thing, why not just do that?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists