[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1342856835.7739.19.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 09:47:15 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>, mgalbraith@...e.com,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: Deadlocks due to per-process plugging
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 07:30 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 06:44 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > The patch in question for missing Cc. Maybe should be only mutex, but I
> > see no reason why IO dependency can only possibly exist for mutexes...
>
> Well that was easy, box quickly said "nope, mutex only does NOT cut it".
And I also learned (ouch) that both doesn't cut it either. Ksoftirqd
(or sirq-blk) being nailed by q->lock in blk_done_softirq() is.. not
particularly wonderful. As long as that doesn't happen, IO deadlock
doesn't happen, troublesome filesystems just work. If it does happen
though, you've instantly got a problem.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists