[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <500BE68D.90005@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 13:39:57 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
CC: kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@...hat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7.5] kvm: notify host when the guest is
panicked
On 07/21/2012 10:44 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> We can know the guest is panicked when the guest runs on xen.
> But we do not have such feature on kvm.
>
> Another purpose of this feature is: management app(for example:
> libvirt) can do auto dump when the guest is panicked. If management
> app does not do auto dump, the guest's user can do dump by hand if
> he sees the guest is panicked.
>
> We have three solutions to implement this feature:
> 1. use vmcall
> 2. use I/O port
> 3. use virtio-serial.
>
> We have decided to avoid touching hypervisor. The reason why I choose
> choose the I/O port is:
> 1. it is easier to implememt
> 2. it does not depend any virtual device
> 3. it can work when starting the kernel
Was the option of implementing a virtio-watchdog driver considered?
You're basically re-implementing a watchdog, a guest-host interface and a set of protocols for guest-host communications.
Why can't we re-use everything we have now, push a virtio watchdog driver into drivers/watchdog/, and gain a more complete solution to detecting hangs inside the guest.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists