linux-kernel - [ 099/108] ACPI / PM: Make acpi_pm_device_sleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120723010706.588503517@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2012 02:08:30 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: [ 099/108] ACPI / PM: Make acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() follow the
 specification

3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>

commit dbe9a2edd17d843d80faf2b99f20a691c1853418 upstream.

The comparison between the system sleep state being entered
and the lowest system sleep state the given device may wake up
from in acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() is reversed, because the
specification (ACPI 5.0) says that for wakeup to work:

"The sleeping state being entered must be less than or equal to the
 power state declared in element 1 of the _PRW object."

In other words, the state returned by _PRW is the deepest
(lowest-power) system sleep state the device is capable of waking up
the system from.

Moreover, acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() also should check if the
wakeup capability is supported through ACPI, because in principle it
may be done via native PCIe PME, for example, in which case _SxW
should not be evaluated.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/acpi/sleep.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
index a564fc3..d8b381e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
@@ -773,8 +773,8 @@ int acpi_pm_device_sleep_state(struct device *dev, int *d_min_p)
 	 * can wake the system.  _S0W may be valid, too.
 	 */
 	if (acpi_target_sleep_state == ACPI_STATE_S0 ||
-	    (device_may_wakeup(dev) &&
-	     adev->wakeup.sleep_state <= acpi_target_sleep_state)) {
+	    (device_may_wakeup(dev) && adev->wakeup.flags.valid &&
+	     adev->wakeup.sleep_state >= acpi_target_sleep_state)) {
 		acpi_status status;
 
 		acpi_method[3] = 'W';


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/