linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/9] KVM: x86: simplify read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <500CD1AF.8050707@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:23:11 +0800
From:	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] KVM: x86: simplify read_emulated

On 07/21/2012 03:52 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 09:15:44PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> On 07/20/2012 06:58 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:17:36AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>>> On 07/20/2012 07:58 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> -	}
>>>>>> +	rc = ctxt->ops->read_emulated(ctxt, addr, mc->data + mc->end, size,
>>>>>> +				      &ctxt->exception);
>>>>>> +	if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
>>>>>> +		return rc;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	mc->end += size;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +read_cached:
>>>>>> +	memcpy(dest, mc->data + mc->pos, size);
>>>>>
>>>>> What prevents read_emulated(size > 8) call, with
>>>>> mc->pos == (mc->end - 8) now?
>>>>
>>>> Marcelo,
>>>>
>>>> The splitting has been done in emulator_read_write_onepage:
>>>>
>>>> 	while (bytes) {
>>>> 		unsigned now = min(bytes, 8U);
>>>>
>>>> 		frag = &vcpu->mmio_fragments[vcpu->mmio_nr_fragments++];
>>>> 		frag->gpa = gpa;
>>>> 		frag->data = val;
>>>> 		frag->len = now;
>>>> 		frag->write_readonly_mem = (ret == -EPERM);
>>>>
>>>> 		gpa += now;
>>>> 		val += now;
>>>> 		bytes -= now;
>>>> 	}
>>>>
>>>> So i think it is safe to remove the splitting in read_emulated.
>>>
>>> Yes, it is fine to remove it.
>>>
>>> But splitting in emulate.c prevented the case of _cache read_ with size
>>>> 8 beyond end of mc->data. Must handle that case in read_emulated.
>>>
>>> "What prevents read_emulated(size > 8) call, with mc->pos == (mc->end - 8) now?"
>>
>> You mean the mmio region is partly cached?
>>
>> I think it can not happen. Now, we pass the whole size to emulator_read_write_onepage(),
>> after it is finished, it saves the whole data into mc->data[], so, the cache-read
>> can always get the whole data from mc->data[].
> 
> I mean that nothing prevents a caller from reading beyond the end of
> mc->data array (but then again this was the previous behavior).

1024 bytes should be enough for instructions, may be we can add a WARN_ON
to check buffer-overflow.

> 
> ACK
> 

Thank you, Marcelo!



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/