linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] thermal: fix build error at thermal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1343028487.1682.316.camel@rui.sh.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:28:07 +0800
From:	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc:	Devendra Naga <develkernel412222@...il.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Fengguang Wu <wfg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: fix build error at thermal_sys.c

On 一, 2012-07-23 at 08:54 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Rui,
> 
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:02:16 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > BTW: what is the rule for linux-next?
> > I refreshed the patches, did some test, and sent to mailing list
> > saying that I want to push them to linux-next, please review.
> > And then I got bug report from linux-next...
> > shouldn't them be merged after I sending git pull request?
> 
> Your tree is set for linux-next inclusion.
>  This means that, every day,
> the current state of (one branch of) your tree makes it into that day's
> linux-next. linux-next receives some testing so you may receive bug
> reports that way (most frequently merge and build issues.)
> 
> But patches don't go from linux-next to Linus's upstream tree
> automatically. Whenever you want your patches to actually go to Linus,
> you must ask Linus explicitly to pull them.
> 
> So, when a build issue is found in linux-next, the right thing to do is
> to blast the faulty branch and recreate it without the build breakage,
> then have it go in at least one linux-next iterations to make sure you
> did get things right this time, and only then ask Linus to pull from
> your branch.
> 
I know they should stay in linux-next for a while before asking Linus to
pull them, but I did not expect them to go into linux-next immediately
when I submitted all the patches into my next branch and sent out for
review.

so "my tree is set for linux-next inclusion" means that, all the stuff
will be merged in linux-next automatically, even if I have not asked
linux-next to pull my changes, right?

sorry for the mistake again.

thanks,
rui



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/