[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <500D0949.9040301@panasas.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:20:25 +0300
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs.git; pile 1
On 07/22/2012 11:20 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> I think the least painful solution is this: I've created a new branch
> (for-linus-2) in there, growing off the parent of merge in nfs.git.
> I've put the fixup to kern_path_locked() there as a separate commit
> + stuff that went in for-linus after that point.
>
Does this means that between "kern_path_locked() patch" and it's fixup
the tree is not bisectable? or is it just an enhancement/simplification?
Not having any opinion, just wants to know
Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists