[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <500D20A1.1030800@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:00:01 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@...fujitsu.com>
CC: amwang@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, hpa@...or.com,
rjw@...k.pl, yinghai.lu@...cle.com, tiwai@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: revert "x86: Fix S4 regression"
On 07/17/2012 11:15 AM, Takao Indoh wrote:
> Hi Cong,
>
> When I tested kdump with 3.5.0-rc6 kernel, I found a problem of kdump
> kernel's panic in find_early_table_space().
>
> init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x00000000-0x36ffafff]
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Cannot find space for the kernel page tables
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 3.5.0-rc6 #17
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8158549b>] panic+0xb8/0x1c8
> [<ffffffff8158565d>] ? printk+0x48/0x4a
> [<ffffffff8157304c>] init_memory_mapping+0x46c/0x530
> [<ffffffff818a73c7>] setup_arch+0x669/0xb0e
> [<ffffffff8158565d>] ? printk+0x48/0x4a
> [<ffffffff818a3a1f>] start_kernel+0x9b/0x34a
> [<ffffffff818a332d>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x131/0x136
> [<ffffffff818a341f>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xed/0xf4
>
> In find_early_table_space(), a kernel tries to find free area below 512M
> for pgtable using memblock_find_in_range, but it fails because kdump
> kernel does not have enough free space below 512M due to the memmap
> restriction. This is the memmap option specified against kdump kernel
> when crashkernel=128M.
>
> memmap=560K@64K memmap=130492K@...608K
>
> Only 560KB area is available and it is not sufficient for pgtable (it
> seems that about 1.8MB area is needed for pgtable). This problem is
> fixed by your revert patch. I hope this patch gets merged.
I can reproduce this issue as well, probably related to some x86 mm init
commits, this alloc failure does not happen with reverting below commits:
bd2753b2dda7bb43c7468826de75f49c6a7e8965
722bc6b16771ed80871e1fd81c86d3627dda2ac8
>
> Thanks,
> Takao Indoh
>
> (2012/06/12 14:21), Cong Wang wrote:
>> From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>>
>> This reverts the following commit:
>>
>> commit 8548c84da2f47e71bbbe300f55edb768492575f7
>> Author: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
>> Date: Sun Oct 23 23:19:12 2011 +0200
>>
>> x86: Fix S4 regression
>>
>> Commit 4b239f458 ("x86-64, mm: Put early page table high") causes a S4
>> regression since 2.6.39, namely the machine reboots occasionally at S4
>> resume. It doesn't happen always, overall rate is about 1/20. But,
>> like other bugs, once when this happens, it continues to happen.
>>
>> This patch fixes the problem by essentially reverting the memory
>> assignment in the older way.
>>
>> According to the previous discussion:
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133161674120253&w=2
>> it seems that so far the best solution is just reverting it.
>>
>> Takashi, could you help to test if the S4 regression is still
>> there after this patch?
>>
>> Reported-by: CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
>> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
>> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>
>> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/mm/init.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>> index bc4e9d8..7ab7975 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
>> @@ -74,8 +74,9 @@ static void __init find_early_table_space(struct map_range *mr, unsigned long en
>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
>> /* for fixmap */
>> tables += roundup(__end_of_fixed_addresses * sizeof(pte_t), PAGE_SIZE);
>> -#endif
>> +
>> good_end = max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +#endif
>>
>> base = memblock_find_in_range(start, good_end, tables, PAGE_SIZE);
>> if (!base)
>>
--
Thanks
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists