linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] PWM: Add support for configuring polarity of PWM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <518397C60809E147AF5323E0420B992E3E971AE3@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:05:26 +0000
From:	"Philip, Avinash" <avinashphilip@...com>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>,
	"Hebbar, Gururaja" <gururaja.hebbar@...com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] PWM: Add support for configuring polarity of PWM

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 18:38:25, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:51:11PM +0000, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 14:00:32, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 06:24:13PM +0530, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> [...]
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags)) {
> > > > +		dev_err(pwm->chip->dev,
> > > > +			"Polarity configuration Failed!, PWM device enabled\n");
> > > > +		return -EBUSY;
> > > > +	}
> > > 
> > > Maybe something like: "polarity cannot be configured while PWM device is
> > > enabled"?
> > 
> > Ok I will update.
> > 
> > > Though I'm not sure the error message is all that useful. I'd
> > > expect the user driver to handle -EBUSY specially.
> > 
> > On EBUSY, client driver has to rework on it. Nothing to be done from
> > framework
> 
> Exactly, so I think that if an error is displayed because the PWM has
> been enabled, then that client (== user) driver should output an error
> message, not the framework. Also, it really shouldn't happen because it
> clearly is a driver problem that needs to be fixed.

Ok. I will remove.

> 
> > > >  /*
> > > >   * pwm_enable - start a PWM output toggling
> > > >   */
> > > > @@ -37,6 +47,7 @@ struct pwm_chip;
> > > >  enum {
> > > >  	PWMF_REQUESTED = 1 << 0,
> > > >  	PWMF_ENABLED = 1 << 1,
> > > > +	PWMF_POLARITY_INVERSE = 1 << 2,
> > > 
> > > This should be named PWMF_POLARITY_INVERSED for consistency.
> > 
> > Ok I will correct it.
> > 
> > > I'm not sure that we really need this flag, though. It isn't used anywhere. But
> > > maybe you have a use-case in mind?
> > 
> > It can be used to find the polarity of the PWM at runtime.
> 
> Yes, but is there any use-case where this information would be required?

It's been added as a feature enhancement. May be it can ignore?


Thanks
Avinash

> 
> Thierry
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/