[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120723213034.GF12438@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:30:35 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
"ccross@...roid.com" <ccross@...roid.com>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>, "lrg@...com" <lrg@...com>,
"thierry.reding@...onic-design.de" <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps6586x: add support for input supply
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:54:55PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/15/2012 03:21 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:45:12PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> >> I was thinking that 1/2 should also go through your tree to
> >> avoid any functionality break on existing platform who are using
> >> this regulator.
> > I'd be happy to do that if the ARM people are happy with it; just
> > let me know and resend the patch if you want me to apply it.
> Patch 2/2 really depends on patch 1/2 to avoid git bisect breakage;
> are you able to rebase it to maintain that order when applying it?
No, especially since Linus already merged the regulator changes for 3.6.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists