[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACxGe6uo8jx3GQFQpQ5RTHF5JyN2hEgvcvdmSYfGyTQnzK9fOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:31:00 -0600
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: next/mmotm unbootable on G5: irqdomain
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 01:59 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> My tree must be rebased to eliminate bisect breakage. The existing
>> commits in my tree have the breakage, and fiddling with the merge
>> order doesn't affect that. I don't want to rebase though. The safest
>> approach (smallest window of breakage) is to apply that fix onto my
>> irqdomain tree.
>
> With your other breakage on pseries I'm thinking rebasing might be the
> only option...
Fair enough. I'm not planning to ask Linus to pull for a few days yet
anyway. I've been pretty useless as a kernel maintainer for the last 3
months so I want to give a bit more time in linux-next to catch
fallout before it gets merged.
As-is I'm backing off from the linear/legacy/tree merge patch as just
too risky. I've already pulled that stuff out of linux-next.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists