lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2012 02:07:52 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
	Jian Li <jiali@...hat.com>, Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Subject: [ 061/108] cifs: on CONFIG_HIGHMEM machines, limit the rsize/wsize to the kmap
 space

3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>

commit 3ae629d98bd5ed77585a878566f04f310adbc591 upstream.

We currently rely on being able to kmap all of the pages in an async
read or write request. If you're on a machine that has CONFIG_HIGHMEM
set then that kmap space is limited, sometimes to as low as 512 slots.

With 512 slots, we can only support up to a 2M r/wsize, and that's
assuming that we can get our greedy little hands on all of them. There
are other users however, so it's possible we'll end up stuck with a
size that large.

Since we can't handle a rsize or wsize larger than that currently, cap
those options at the number of kmap slots we have. We could consider
capping it even lower, but we currently default to a max of 1M. Might as
well allow those luddites on 32 bit arches enough rope to hang
themselves.

A more robust fix would be to teach the send and receive routines how
to contend with an array of pages so we don't need to marshal up a kvec
array at all. That's a fairly significant overhaul though, so we'll need
this limit in place until that's ready.

Reported-by: Jian Li <jiali@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 fs/cifs/connect.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
index 0ae86dd..94b7788 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
@@ -3445,6 +3445,18 @@ void cifs_setup_cifs_sb(struct smb_vol *pvolume_info,
 #define CIFS_DEFAULT_NON_POSIX_RSIZE (60 * 1024)
 #define CIFS_DEFAULT_NON_POSIX_WSIZE (65536)
 
+/*
+ * On hosts with high memory, we can't currently support wsize/rsize that are
+ * larger than we can kmap at once. Cap the rsize/wsize at
+ * LAST_PKMAP * PAGE_SIZE. We'll never be able to fill a read or write request
+ * larger than that anyway.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
+#define CIFS_KMAP_SIZE_LIMIT	(LAST_PKMAP * PAGE_CACHE_SIZE)
+#else /* CONFIG_HIGHMEM */
+#define CIFS_KMAP_SIZE_LIMIT	(1<<24)
+#endif /* CONFIG_HIGHMEM */
+
 static unsigned int
 cifs_negotiate_wsize(struct cifs_tcon *tcon, struct smb_vol *pvolume_info)
 {
@@ -3475,6 +3487,9 @@ cifs_negotiate_wsize(struct cifs_tcon *tcon, struct smb_vol *pvolume_info)
 		wsize = min_t(unsigned int, wsize,
 				server->maxBuf - sizeof(WRITE_REQ) + 4);
 
+	/* limit to the amount that we can kmap at once */
+	wsize = min_t(unsigned int, wsize, CIFS_KMAP_SIZE_LIMIT);
+
 	/* hard limit of CIFS_MAX_WSIZE */
 	wsize = min_t(unsigned int, wsize, CIFS_MAX_WSIZE);
 
@@ -3516,6 +3531,9 @@ cifs_negotiate_rsize(struct cifs_tcon *tcon, struct smb_vol *pvolume_info)
 	if (!(server->capabilities & CAP_LARGE_READ_X))
 		rsize = min_t(unsigned int, CIFSMaxBufSize, rsize);
 
+	/* limit to the amount that we can kmap at once */
+	rsize = min_t(unsigned int, rsize, CIFS_KMAP_SIZE_LIMIT);
+
 	/* hard limit of CIFS_MAX_RSIZE */
 	rsize = min_t(unsigned int, rsize, CIFS_MAX_RSIZE);
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ