lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120723010704.967342127@decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2012 02:08:20 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Tomas Hruby <thruby@...gle.com>,
	Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>,
	Yaniv Rosner <yanivr@...adcom.com>,
	Merav Sicron <meravs@...adcom.com>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	Robert Evans <evansr@...gle.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [ 089/108] bnx2x: fix panic when TX ring is full

3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

commit bc14786a100cc6a81cd060e8031ec481241b418c upstream.

There is a off by one error in the minimal number of BD in
bnx2x_start_xmit() and bnx2x_tx_int() before stopping/resuming tx queue.

A full size GSO packet, with data included in skb->head really needs
(MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 4) BDs, because of bnx2x_tx_split()

This error triggers if BQL is disabled and heavy TCP transmit traffic
occurs.

bnx2x_tx_split() definitely can be called, remove a wrong comment.

Reported-by: Tomas Hruby <thruby@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>
Cc: Yaniv Rosner <yanivr@...adcom.com>
Cc: Merav Sicron <meravs@...adcom.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc: Robert Evans <evansr@...gle.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c |    8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c
index cbc56f2..8098eea 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ int bnx2x_tx_int(struct bnx2x *bp, struct bnx2x_fp_txdata *txdata)
 
 		if ((netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq)) &&
 		    (bp->state == BNX2X_STATE_OPEN) &&
-		    (bnx2x_tx_avail(bp, txdata) >= MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 3))
+		    (bnx2x_tx_avail(bp, txdata) >= MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 4))
 			netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
 
 		__netif_tx_unlock(txq);
@@ -2516,8 +2516,6 @@ int bnx2x_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 /* we split the first BD into headers and data BDs
  * to ease the pain of our fellow microcode engineers
  * we use one mapping for both BDs
- * So far this has only been observed to happen
- * in Other Operating Systems(TM)
  */
 static noinline u16 bnx2x_tx_split(struct bnx2x *bp,
 				   struct bnx2x_fp_txdata *txdata,
@@ -3171,7 +3169,7 @@ netdev_tx_t bnx2x_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 
 	txdata->tx_bd_prod += nbd;
 
-	if (unlikely(bnx2x_tx_avail(bp, txdata) < MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 3)) {
+	if (unlikely(bnx2x_tx_avail(bp, txdata) < MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 4)) {
 		netif_tx_stop_queue(txq);
 
 		/* paired memory barrier is in bnx2x_tx_int(), we have to keep
@@ -3180,7 +3178,7 @@ netdev_tx_t bnx2x_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 		smp_mb();
 
 		fp->eth_q_stats.driver_xoff++;
-		if (bnx2x_tx_avail(bp, txdata) >= MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 3)
+		if (bnx2x_tx_avail(bp, txdata) >= MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 4)
 			netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
 	}
 	txdata->tx_pkt++;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ