[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJSP0QVU3_Y-ASC+G4pgGpBzym3+PZPD=adbYHVB5Uxs5kTr5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:43:43 +0100
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...il.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Yoshihiro YUNOMAE <yoshihiro.yunomae.ez@...achi.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"Franch Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] virtio-trace: Support virtio-trace
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Masami Hiramatsu
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
> (2012/07/24 19:02), Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Yoshihiro YUNOMAE
>> <yoshihiro.yunomae.ez@...achi.com> wrote:
>>> The performance of each method is compared as follows:
>>> [1] Native
>>> - only recording trace data to ring-buffer on a guest
>>> [2] Virtio-trace
>>> - running a trace agent on a guest
>>> - a reader on a host opens FIFO using cat command
>>> [3] IVRing
>>> - A SystemTap script in a guest records trace data to IVRing.
>>> -- probe points are same as ftrace.
>>> [4] Virtio-serial(normal)
>>> - A reader(using cat) on a guest output trace data to a host using
>>> standard output via virtio-serial.
>>
>> The first time I read this I thought you are adding a new virtio-trace
>> device. But it looks like this series really add splice support to
>> virtio-console and that yields a big performance improvement when
>> sending trace_pipe_raw.
>
> Yes, sorry for the confusion. Actually this is an enhancement of
> virtio-serial. I'm working with Yoshihiro on this feature.
>
>> Guest ftrace is useful and I like this. Have you thought about
>> controlling ftrace from the host? Perhaps a command could be added to
>> the QEMU guest agent which basically invokes trace-cmd/perf.
>
> As you can see, guest trace-agent can be controlled via a
> control channel. In our scenario, host tools can control that
> instead of guest one.
>
> We are considering that exporting the tracing part of guest's
> debugfs to host via another virtio-serial channel by using
> 9pfs, so that the host tools can refer that.
>
> (In this scenario, guest trace-agent will also provide 9pfs server.
> Since it means that the agent can handle writing a special file,
> trace-agent can be controlled via the special file on exported
> debugfs.)
>
> Of course, this also requires modifying trace-cmd/perf to accept
> some options like guest-debugfs mount point, guest's serial
> channel pipe (or unix socket?), etc. However, it will be a small
> change.
Okay, thanks for explaining some of the ideas you have. I won't ask
more because it's out of scope for this patch series :).
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists