[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <500EAAC2.2020802@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 08:01:38 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] perf top: error handling for counter creation should
parallel perf-record
On 7/23/12 12:15 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 05:25:54PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
>> index e3cab5f..0ce665c 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
>> @@ -943,8 +943,10 @@ try_again:
>> * based cpu-clock-tick sw counter, which
>> * is always available even if no PMU support:
>> */
>> - if (attr->type == PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE &&
>> - attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES) {
>> + if ((err == ENOENT || err == ENXIO)
>> + && attr->type == PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE
>> + && attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES) {
>> +
>
> usual style:
>
> if ((err == ENOENT || err == ENXIO) &&
> attr->type == PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE &&
> attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES) {
>
Right. I literally made it the same as builtin-record.c. I'll resubmit.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists