lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1343138818.5132.98.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:06:58 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ 028/108] sched/nohz: Rewrite and fix load-avg computation --
 again

On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 02:07 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> ------------------
> 
> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> 
> commit 5167e8d5417bf5c322a703d2927daec727ea40dd upstream.
> 
> Thanks to Charles Wang for spotting the defects in the current code:
> 
>  - If we go idle during the sample window -- after sampling, we get a
>    negative bias because we can negate our own sample.
> 
>  - If we wake up during the sample window we get a positive bias
>    because we push the sample to a known active period.
> 
> So rewrite the entire nohz load-avg muck once again, now adding
> copious documentation to the code.
[...]

Based on <http://bugs.debian.org/674153>, I think we also need:

556061b sched/nohz: Fix rq->cpu_load[] calculations
5aaa0b7 sched/nohz: Fix rq->cpu_load calculations some more

Does this ('sched/nohz: Rewrite and fix load-avg computation -- again')
depend in any way on those, or are they separate fixes?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
If more than one person is responsible for a bug, no one is at fault.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ