linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/34] Memory management performance backports for -stable V2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJd=RBCCueEWm7Kkfbarp-LiNQwsc5RT_o1xVqEE56+U+Ogg4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:11:13 +0800
From:	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/34] Memory management performance backports for -stable V2

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 09:34:56PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
>> > I would suggest the user in question use the normal support channels for
>> > resolving a potentially SLES-specific bug.
>> >
>> Thanks, Mel.
>>
>> Is Mike busy in other fairs?
>
> It's not for me whether to say whether he is or not. SUSE already provide
> excellent support channel for handling bugs like the one. If the user uses
> them, they are very likely to find that this particular bug was resolved
> in February 2011 by Mike without you stamping your foot on LKML.
>
If you pay for good products and service, you see why
I forwarded the message to you, the SUSE gurus.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/