[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <500EFF10.3050607@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:01:20 -0600
From: Jeff Law <law@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] posix_types.h: make __NFDBITS compatible with glibc
definition
On 07/24/12 13:43, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> I think we should likely keep __FD_SETSIZE, since that really is a
> valid kernel value (that the kernel actually uses). The rest looks
> *entirely* bogus.
I can certainly live with that.
Josh, looks like you've got marching orders :-)
Of course there'll be some kind of fallout, there always is.
> And the reason I emphasize the "entirely" is literally that the kernel
> headers don't even define the full __FD_SET/CLR/ISSET() functionality.
I know. When this first came to my attention I feared I'd find another
implementation of FD_{SET,CLR}/ISSET.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists