[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120724212616.GA29546@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:26:16 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mikew@...gle.com" <mikew@...gle.com>,
"dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>,
"dzickus@...hat.com" <dzickus@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/3] Hold multiple logs
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 09:12:25PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > I think we inevitably lose in that scenario. I'd need to verify, but my
> > recollection is that overwriting existing variables may be equivalent to
> > a delete/create cycle.
>
> This would mean that EFI really wants the OS to treat EFI variables as pretty much
> exclusively read-only. Any activity which periodically updates a variable would
> eventually run into problems in an EFI implementation that loses the old space
> until a reset.
Sure. I'll test with a few implementations and see what I can figure
out. We may just want to reserve some space for pstore, then have delete
in pstore simply map to hiding the entries rather than deleting them.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists