[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <500FDDD1.5080805@parallels.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:51:45 +0400
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpu: intel, amd: mask cleared cpuid features
On 07/20/2012 09:10 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> + unsigned int *msr_ext_cpuid_mask)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int msr, msr_ext;
>> +
>> + msr = msr_ext = 0;
>> +
>> + switch (c->x86_model) {
> You have to check the family too.
>
>> +
>> + return msr;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __cpuinit intel_mask_cpu_caps(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>> +{
>> + u32 low, high;
>> + unsigned int msr_cpuid_mask, msr_ext_cpuid_mask;
>> +
>> + msr_cpuid_mask = intel_cpuid_mask_msr(c,&msr_ext_cpuid_mask);
>> + if (msr_cpuid_mask) {
>> + set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CPUIDMASK);
>> +
>> + rdmsr(msr_cpuid_mask, low, high);
> And please use rdmsrl(), rdmsr() is so 90ies
>
> Other than that patch looks good. I presume it will be useful for
> other things than just migration too.
>
> -Andi
>
Thank you for review, but we've decided to drop this since the kernel
does not seem to be a suitable place for such "tweaking".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists