[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120725171919.GA1191@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 19:19:19 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, acme@...hat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, eranian@...gle.com,
gorcunov@...nvz.org, tzanussi@...il.com, mhiramat@...hat.com,
robert.richter@....com, fche@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
drepper@...il.com, asharma@...com, benjamin.redelings@...cent.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 00/17] perf: Add backtrace post dwarf unwind
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 02:14:23PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > patches available also as tarball in here:
> > http://people.redhat.com/~jolsa/perf_post_unwind_v7.tar.bz2
> >
> > v7 changes:
> > - omitted v6 patches 9 and 15
> > They need more work and will be sent separately. I dont want to hold off whole
> > patchset because of them. We could miss some related backtraces (syscall, vdso)
> > in this version.
> > - v6 patch 11, 14, 20 already in
>
> I'm personally ok with the kernel bits. And the tool bits look
> like a nice base to work on.
>
> If nobody has a strong opposition, it would be nice to merge
> this in -tip. Either in perf/core or in some staging tree. So
> that we continue incrementally.
>
> Nice work overall, thanks!
Agreed, this is a nice step forward. Arnaldo, I suppose I'll get
it all from you as a whole?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists