[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5010547E.2090404@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:18:06 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/build change for v3.6
On 07/25/2012 01:15 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> This is not as expected....
> In this silly example it is maybe obvious but I have lost hours tracking
> down bugs due to this.
> You add a new target and suddenly someting unrelated breaks.
>
> What happens is that make consider the assignment a command due to the leading
> tab - and because is follows a target (or other commands).
>
> I hope this makes it clear why many makefiles in the kernel uses tabs for indent.
>
This is also a good reason why not to indent assignments in Makefiles by
full tab stops. A smaller indent can't be scrambled this way.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists