[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BC5CD145C5D9E74D86490E60F52766FF1EBCFCDD@ORSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:28:38 +0000
From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"yinghai@...nel.org" <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"agordeev@...hat.com" <agordeev@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com" <yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86/ioapic: Fix NULL pointer dereference on CPU hotplug
after disabling irqs
Tomoki wrote:
> In current Linux, percpu variable `vector_irq' is not always cleared when
> a CPU is offlined. If the cpu that has the disabled irqs in vector_irq is
> hotplugged again, __setup_vector_irq() hits invalid irq vector and may
> crash.
>
> Commit f6175f5bfb4c partially fixes this, but was not enough in
> environments with IOMMU IRQ remapper.
So, this patch essentially makes the commit f6175f5bfb4c unnecessary, right?
Can you revert that too as part of this new proposed patch?
thanks,
suresh--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists