[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1343290299.26034.84.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 10:11:39 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] page-table walkers vs memory order
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 15:09 -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> We find out after it hits us, and someone studies the disassembly -
> if we're lucky enough to crash near the origin of the problem.
This is a rather painful way.. see
https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/5/555
we were lucky there in that the lack of ACCESS_ONCE() caused an infinite
loop so we knew exactly where we got stuck.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists