[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50110CF3.4070308@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:25:07 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: remove dummy pages
On 07/26/2012 04:56 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/26/2012 06:58 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> Currently, kvm allocates some pages and use them as error indicators,
>> it wastes memory and is not good for scalability
>>
>> Base on Avi's suggestion, we use the error codes instead of these pages
>> to indicate the error conditions
>>
>>
>> +static pfn_t get_bad_pfn(void)
>> +{
>> + return -ENOENT;
>> +}
>> +
>> +pfn_t get_fault_pfn(void)
>> +{
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_fault_pfn);
>> +
>> +static pfn_t get_hwpoison_pfn(void)
>> +{
>> + return -EHWPOISON;
>> +}
>> +
>
> Would be better as #defines
Okay.
>
>> int is_hwpoison_pfn(pfn_t pfn)
>> {
>> - return pfn == hwpoison_pfn;
>> + return pfn == -EHWPOISON;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_hwpoison_pfn);
>>
>> int is_noslot_pfn(pfn_t pfn)
>> {
>> - return pfn == bad_pfn;
>> + return pfn == -ENOENT;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_noslot_pfn);
>>
>> int is_invalid_pfn(pfn_t pfn)
>> {
>> - return pfn == hwpoison_pfn || pfn == fault_pfn;
>> + return !is_noslot_pfn(pfn) && is_error_pfn(pfn);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_invalid_pfn);
>>
>
> So is_*_pfn() could go away and be replaced by ==.
>
Okay.
>>
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gfn_to_page);
>>
>> void kvm_release_page_clean(struct page *page)
>> {
>> - kvm_release_pfn_clean(page_to_pfn(page));
>> + if (!is_error_page(page))
>> + kvm_release_pfn_clean(page_to_pfn(page));
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_release_page_clean);
>
> Note, we can remove calls to kvm_release_page_clean() from error paths
> now, so in the future we can drop the test.
>
Right, since the release path (kvm_release_page_clean) is used in many place
and on many architectures, i did the change as small as possible for good
review.
> Since my comments are better done as a separate patch,
Yes, i will make a patch to apply all your comments. Thank you, Avi!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists